I was reading New Avengers:The Reunion #2 and was bothered by the possible return of Monica Rappaccini, an A.I.M. scientist supreme who was apparently exploded in MODAK's 11. Now, explosions are the easiest way to "kill" a character but leaving enough of a loophole to bring the character back later. It's on the opposite end of the scale as a goblin glider through the chest. What irks me though is that to explain her not death, all that was given was "She must have survived."
Really? That's the best you can come up with. A woman in charge of a super-science army and just "must have survived"? Lame. It made me think of Andy Diggle's start in Thunderbolts when he really needed the second Black Widow on his team, who was mutated and killed in New Avengers. The explanation? "That's what they were supposed to think." Now, I love Diggle from The Losers, Adam Strange:Planet Heist, Silent Dragon and Green Arrow: Year One. But you don't explain away what you don't like in a continuity based shared universe with sarcastic comebacks.
Then again, a five part wank fest for a boring, quarter century dead hero probably isn't the way to go, either. Does anyone else feel like Kid Flash reading The Flash:Rebirth?
1 comment:
You're actually lucky you even got a "I guess they survived" as there have been far too many villains who have just uped and died in one story, and then some other writer (not being supervised by the editor) suddenly has that character walking around again. (I'm talking about Bendis. The Hood's crew might be good, but not all of their histories where looked over very thorogly.)
http://kandouerik.blogspot.com/
Blog has Comics, Anime, Manga, and Japanese Film.
http://supersentaiimages.blogspot.com/
Super Sentai Images (Japanese Power Rangers)
Post a Comment